Written question AQW 15655/22-27

Written question by Mr Pat Sheehan on .

MLA
Mr Pat Sheehan
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
24 September 2024
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 15655/22-27
Department
Department of Justice
Business
To the Minister of Justice
Assembly identifier
Document 411380

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Justice to detail (i) any additional resources her Department can provide to address the increased levels of antisocial behaviour at the interface between Springfield Road and Springmartin Estate; and (ii) any other initiatives she will consider to improve community cohesion in these areas.

48 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.10 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.93).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.95).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.09No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.07No
Dog-whistle messaging0.04No
Controversy escalation0.07No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.93Yes
Overall judgement0.10At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.95
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.03
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.88
No identity-related subject0.11
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 02:03 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification