Debate contribution: Conversion Practices (Criminalisation) Bill: Second Stage

Debate contribution by Mr Eóin Tennyson on .

MLA
Mr Eóin Tennyson
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
22 September 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Conversion Practices (Criminalisation) Bill: Second Stage
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5741113

Text

I thank the Member for giving way and for her engagement in a pre-legislative scrutiny session with all members of the Communities Committee, which was really constructive. She talks about gaps. There are two gaps, which have already been identified and stood up by the case studies and evidence that have been referenced in the debate. The first major gap is that unregulated talking therapy is not likely to be prosecutable under existing law, because it is not a criminal offence for someone to call themselves a therapist and set up a service. That is the most common form of conversion practice, as we understand it, in Northern Ireland, and survivor testimony suggests that it is very prevalent. The other gap is where there is coercive and controlling behaviour between individuals who are not personally connected. The Member is absolutely right: if individuals who are personally connected engage in conversion therapy, the person may well be prosecutable under domestic abuse legislation at present. However, if a youth leader, a pastor or a minister engages in the same behaviour, they may not be prosecutable under existing law. Those are the two gaps that we are seeking to address. It is open to debate whether we have done so adequately.

208 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Awaiting analysis

This record has not been analysed yet. It is not counted in any total until it has been assessed.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification