Debate contribution: Conversion Practices (Criminalisation) Bill: Second Stage
Debate contribution by Mr Brian Kingston on .
- MLA
- Mr Brian Kingston
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 22 September 2026
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Private Members' Business
- Heading
- Conversion Practices (Criminalisation) Bill: Second Stage
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5741015
Read the official Assembly record
Text
I will come on to your point. Clause 2 is titled "Offence of engaging in coercive conversion behaviour". What is coercive conversion behaviour? We are told, at clause 5, that that means "behaviour ... that is violent". No one will support violent behaviour. It is "behaviour ... that is threatening". It is:
"controlling, regulating or monitoring the victim's day-to-day activities".
Is it any wonder that people are concerned about the impact of the legislation on parents, whose daily activity involves regulating and monitoring their children's activities? We expect them to have parental control over their children. Clause 5 goes on to state that "coercive behaviour" also means:
"restricting the victim's freedom of action".
If a parent grounds a child to their room or to the thinking step, or whatever people are allowed to call it nowadays, is that restricting their freedom of action? The clause carries on, and the bar gets lower and lower. "Coercive behaviour" also means:
"making the victim feel frightened, humiliated, degraded, punished or intimidated".
That is a very low bar. We are concerned that the Bill would criminalise parents. It is hugely subjective and comes down to the victim's perception.
194 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Awaiting analysis
This record has not been analysed yet. It is not counted in any total until it has been assessed.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.