Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

Debate contribution by Mrs Deborah Erskine on .

MLA
Mrs Deborah Erskine
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
22 September 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5739918

Read the official Assembly record

Text

He apologises, although I am sure that he will watch back my contribution. I talked about my constituency of Fermanagh and South Tyrone, where such issues are resolved through community dialogue and people working together, without even the input of political representatives.

42 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.25 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.99).
  • Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.14No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.12No
Dog-whistle messaging0.09No
Controversy escalation0.20No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.23No
Overall judgement0.25At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.99
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.39
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.34
No identity-related subject0.24
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.02
Another identity-related subject0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 16:37 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification