Debate contribution: Conversion Practices (Criminalisation) Bill: Second Stage

Debate contribution by Mr Paul Frew on .

MLA
Mr Paul Frew
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
15 September 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Conversion Practices (Criminalisation) Bill: Second Stage
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5707039

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. Add to that the very fact that the police will be forced to act and go into people's living rooms. That means that the process of a criminal conviction, or at least an investigation, will commence, and it will be to the detriment of the parent, teacher, pastor or preacher.

57 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.54 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.62).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.81).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was moderate at most and none of the culture-war criteria was close to being met.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.23No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.28No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.47No
Controversy escalation0.26No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.62Yes
Overall judgement0.54Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.81
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.01
Adopts it0.17
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.72
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)0.23
No identity-related subject0.04
Another identity-related subject0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 16:22 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification