Debate contribution: Conversion Practices (Criminalisation) Bill: Second Stage

Debate contribution by Mr Peter Martin on .

MLA
Mr Peter Martin
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
15 September 2026
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Conversion Practices (Criminalisation) Bill: Second Stage
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5706699

Read the official Assembly record

Text

"Transgender" does not appear in the Bill. The thoughts that I have just read out speak for themselves. I am glad to get those voices into the Chamber, because we will not hear them from the other side of the House, and those people exist. I will give way to the Member.

52 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Uncertain: weak signal Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues

Uncertain: this record is published but not counted in any total.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.43 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text adopts the identity-based framing in its own voice (0.53).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The answers did not meet either automatic threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.50No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.13No
Cultural grievance politics0.23No
Dog-whistle messaging0.27No
Controversy escalation0.42No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.18No
Overall judgement0.43Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.32
Reports or questions it0.14
Criticises or condemns it0.01
Adopts it (chosen)0.53
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.98
No identity-related subject0.01
Another identity-related subject0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 01:21 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification