Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage

Debate contribution by Mrs Naomi Long on .

MLA
Mrs Naomi Long
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
22 June 2026
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Executive Committee Business
Heading
Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5638994

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. It is not about accessibility. The wider enabling access to justice programme that was laid with the Committee a number of months ago deals with wider issues around accessibility. For example, I talked about changing the financial threshold, because, as you know, there is an upper limit. I believe that that upper limit is now too low and excludes a lot of people who could not afford to take legal action themselves. We talked about that being the wide end of the funnel and then looking, at the other end, at what the public benefit and public good is from serving. That is because cases are also taken under legal aid that serve no particular public good, and we need to look at how we prevent that from happening.

It is not, therefore, about access but about ensuring that the money that we have — we are spending more money on legal aid this year than we ever have before, so it is not about cuts to legal aid — is transparent and fully accounted for, and that we can have confidence that people are being paid for a job well done and that the work that they put in and the remuneration that they get match. I do not think that that is unreasonable. I think that most people, in any line of employment, would expect as much. Certainly, when I was working in my professional capacity as an engineer, I was expected to keep time sheets. It is not unusual for people to have to record the work that they do and to be rewarded for its complexity as well as the time that is spent. All of that is in there. By agreeing to the new clause, the Committee would be given the opportunity to scrutinise all of that. At the minute, you cannot, because that decision is taken elsewhere and is beyond our control.

325 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.95).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.02No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.95Yes
Overall judgement0.03At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.98
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.01
Another identity-related subject0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 16:11 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification