Debate contribution: PSNI: Holiday Pay and Pension

Debate contribution by Mrs Naomi Long on .

MLA
Mrs Naomi Long
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
30 June 2026
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Heading
PSNI: Holiday Pay and Pension
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5653260

Text

We have had active engagement, as I said, with the PSNI and the Department of Finance, because, ultimately, we will have to get the money to pay for it. I have said all along that the extent of the potential costs would far outstrip what the Department of Justice could afford to pay from within its budgetary lines. We have been clear about that from the outset. We are somewhat ahead in the process. As the Member will be aware, some of the issues — the holiday pay, for example — are not pertinent to just police officers. They affect other public servants. We happen to be slightly ahead of those other public services, so we want to resolve the issues as quickly and expeditiously as possible, in the interests of those to whom money is owed and in the interests of setting out clear boundaries around what it might look like as a wider settlement for the whole of the public sector. It is an incredible amount of money. We have already had an allocation of £119 million towards the data breach, and we talking of something in the same order for potential holiday pay, though that is a much more fluid figure. It will depend, a lot, on what the courts and tribunals rule. That is where we are. In all likelihood, it will crystallise, in year. That is why our engagement has been so intense with the PSNI on the business case and with the Department of Finance to get that approved.

255 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Awaiting analysis

This record has not been analysed yet. It is not counted in any total until it has been assessed.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification