Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage

Debate contribution by Mr Paul Givan on .

MLA
Mr Paul Givan
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
16 June 2026
Type
Debate contribution (made as a minister)
Business
Executive Committee Business
Heading
Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 5624397

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Well, at least the Member has decided to come in to join the debate. I was not sure: one minute, Sinn Féin is in; then Sinn Féin is out.

I appreciate what the previous Member who spoke said when apologising to the public for the antics of her own colleague last night. She was right to apologise on her behalf. Maybe the Member herself can apologise for the behaviour last night.

71 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Uncertain: close call

Uncertain: this record is published but not counted in any total.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.50 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • Criteria met: Controversy escalation (0.70).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.85).
  • The answers did not meet either automatic threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.19No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.10No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.26No
Controversy escalation0.70Yes
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.03No
Overall judgement0.50Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.85
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.09
Adopts it0.06
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.52
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.23
Another identity-related subject0.15
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.07
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:53 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification