Debate contribution: Higher Education Funding Review

Debate contribution by Ms Connie Egan on 16 June 2026.

MLA: Ms Connie Egan
Party at the time: Alliance Party
Date: 16 June 2026
Type: Debate contribution
Business: Oral Answers to Questions
Heading: Higher Education Funding Review
Assembly identifier: Official Report component 5623991

Text

Thank you, Minister. The review does not seem to command the support that is required to deliver meaningful change and transformation. What engagement have you had with the universities in recent weeks to design a review process that will have support and buy-in from those who will be most affected by its outcomes?

53 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Part of an exchange

This follow-up belongs to: Topical question AQT 2464/22-27.

Assessment

Not analysed

This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification