Debate contribution: Racially Motivated Riots
Debate contribution by Ms Paula Bradshaw on .
- MLA
- Ms Paula Bradshaw
- Party at the time
- Alliance Party
- Date
- 15 June 2026
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Matter of the Day
- Heading
- Racially Motivated Riots
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5613164
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Last week, we saw scenes on the streets of Belfast and beyond that do not represent who we are or who we should aspire to be. The racist riots that tore through our streets were not just an attack on bricks and mortar but a direct assault on the safety, dignity and belonging of our ethnic minority neighbours. I send my very best wishes to all those people who were displaced over the past week and to the people who were attacked on Donegall Avenue in the early hours of Sunday morning. It is absolutely deplorable that anyone's right to a family life and to privacy would be so grotesquely breached. We in the Alliance Party are clear that Belfast must be a shared city for everyone, but, right now, for many people, including our healthcare workers, students, business owners and children, that is simply not happening. Over the past week, we have seen the worst and the best of people here. I place on record my thanks to the Ormeau community and Cooke Centenary Presbyterian Church for their amazing donation drive over the weekend and thank everybody who donated. I also thank organisations such as Anaka Women's Collective for the subsequent dispersal of essential food and toiletries to people living in our city who are cowering in fear. I was at the donation centre yesterday morning, and I heard about the immense pressures, such as the need for formula milk. I saw volunteers go out and buy it out of their own pocket so that terrified new mothers who are staying in their homes can get that essential nutrition for their precious babies. How horrendous. I also condemn the reckless and malicious targeting of vulnerable people through the online posting of addresses of houses in multiple occupation. It was nothing short of a digital hit list, painting a target on the back of not just migrant workers and people from ethnic minority communities but students and short-term renters. It was not just those from ethnic minority communities who feared that they would be attacked in their home. The weaponisation of data highlights a critical vulnerability, and I thank Belfast City Council for taking down the list. I have written to the Minister for Communities to ask him urgently to review and amend section 62 of the Houses in Multiple Occupation Act (Northern Ireland) 2016. As it stands, there is a statutory requirement to publish a full, unrestricted public register of HMO addresses, including the names of managers, but that was exploited last week by racist agitators and used as a tool of intimidation. We therefore need to address the imbalance between data transparency and the right to a private life. I will address one issue that Gerry Carroll raised. Not to be contrary, but when I spoke to the PSNI on Wednesday afternoon, it had deployed 18 police officers just to the Holylands and lower Lisburn Road —
— area, where those addresses are. I then spoke to the PSNI on Friday —.
Sorry.
505 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.07 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.83).
- The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (1.00).
- Subject area: Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.17 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.04 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.03 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.07 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.83 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.07 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers | 0.99 |
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.01 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 15:47 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.