Debate contribution: Cervical Cancer Screening: Health and Social Care Trusts
Debate contribution by Mr Tom Buchanan on .
- MLA
- Mr Tom Buchanan
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 2 June 2026
- Type
- Debate contribution
- Business
- Oral Answers to Questions
- Heading
- Cervical Cancer Screening: Health and Social Care Trusts
- Assembly identifier
- Official Report component 5584376
Read the official Assembly record
Text
Thank you for that, Minister. That is welcome. Do you accept that the women in the Western Trust were denied the same level of scrutiny and potential redress as those in the Southern Trust? On the back of that question, is the real reason that the Western Trust was excluded because, if it had been included, it would have revealed a much larger systemic failure that would have made the case for a statutory public inquiry unavoidable?
77 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Part of an exchange
This follow-up belongs to: Topical question AQT 2405/22-27.
Assessment
Not analysed
This is the same MLA’s follow-up within the exchange on their own question. It is analysed together with that question and is not counted separately, so one question is never counted twice.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.