Analysis in progress: 97,639 of 97,778 records assessed (99.9%). Totals and rankings will change until it finishes. Progress details

99.9%

Mr Timothy Gaston: Assembly records

All of Mr Timothy Gaston’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not flagged, uncertain or not yet analysed.

3,152 records match, page 9 of 127.

  1. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    I thank the Member for giving way. From your reading of the Bill, is it clear, at any point, who will be in charge of determining whether such flags will remain up or come down? Furthermore, if that new unit — that Parades Commission mark II for flags — is enacted, how many staff will it require and what will be the…

    Not flagged

  2. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    Thank you very much. The Bill sponsor says that it is about certain areas, but the Bill is so wide-ranging, covering: "(b) a shared communal place, (c) an interface area, (d) a new housing development, or (e) a place of worship." I absolutely believe that the Bill sponsor is, to use the phrase that Mr Frew coined, not…

    Uncertain: close call Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials Criteria met: Cultural grievance politics.

  3. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    We have heard that the principles are right but that the vehicle is wrong. The Member has articulated that, because of its overarching responsibilities, the Executive Office should take the matter forward. Time and again, however, as the Member will know from her experience on the Executive Committee, which is a lot…

    Uncertain: close call Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials Criteria met: Cultural grievance politics.

  4. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    I thank the Member for giving way. Knowing what we now know, and having read the blue pages in front of us, can the Member set out what is in the Bill, if the same situation were to happen again, to enable that billboard at the Egyptian Arch to be taken down in a more timely manner? All that I see in the Bill is that…

    Not flagged

  5. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    Bringing it back to the real world, I will give the example of Cullybackey. The Bill states: "The Department may regard the following as a sensitive place— (a) a place where public services are provided". We can read further down the Bill and see that it lists a school. Public authorities are exempt and can fly the…

    Not flagged

  6. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    Clause 2 on sensitive places states that the Department "may". The Alliance Party is trying to instil the thought police into the Department.

    Uncertain: close call Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials Criteria met: Controversy escalation.

  7. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    Thank you very much, Mr Frew. Do you agree that the Bill will put a burden on the law-abiding citizens who put a flag up and take it down, not on the people whom the Alliance Party claims that it wants to target? Those people will not apply via the portal; they will pay no attention to the law. That is why, at the end…

    Uncertain: close call Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials Criteria met: Dog-whistle messaging.

  8. Debate contribution: Display of Flags and Emblems Bill: Second Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    Thank you very much, Mr Frew. The Bill sponsor cites examples of current legislation that is not being followed. Does that not just show the folly of this Bill in that we are trying to duplicate a process that is not being followed by certain Ministers? She chides the Member for not giving examples of an alternative…

    Not flagged

  9. Debate contribution: Support for Veterans and their Families

    • Ministerial Statement

    I welcome the Minister's statement and his continued support for our veterans community. How many of the 95 contacts that have been made to date have resulted in a veteran receiving a benefit, obtaining accommodation or being referred to mental health services? Will the Minister commit to publishing those figures on…

    Not flagged

  10. Member's statement: Independent Remuneration Board

    • Members' Statements

    Just last week, the remuneration board announced that it proposes to increase the basic MLA salary from £67,200 to £69,216 at the beginning of the next mandate, potentially to be followed by annual increases of up to 3% a year thereafter. The announcement comes just months after MLAs' salaries rose by almost 27%, from…

    Not flagged

  11. Written question AQW 52731/22-27

    • Northern Ireland Assembly Commission

    To ask the Assembly Commission to detail the extent of works carried out within all Ministerial offices in Parliament Buildings during the 2022–2027 Assembly mandate, broken down by (i) Minister; (ii) the reason for each item of work undertaken; and (iii) the costs incurred, including expenditure on materials,…

    Not flagged

  12. Written question AQW 52732/22-27

    • Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, pursuant to AQW 31192/22-27, AQW 32777/22-27, AQW 32886/22-27, AQW 35139/22-27, AQW 42831/22-27 and AQW 42912/22-27, to detail (i) whether the review of the Loughs Agency’s staff complement has concluded; (ii) its findings and recommendations; (iii)…

    Not flagged

  13. Debate contribution: Irish-medium Education (Workforce Plan) Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Private Members' Business

    At Second Stage, I opposed the principles of the Bill because it singles out one part of our education system for a statutory workforce planning regime that is not provided for any other sector. None of the amendments addresses that fundamental inequality. Amendment No 1 replaces in its entirety clause 1, which is the…

    Not flagged

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON