Mr Timothy Gaston: Assembly records

All of Mr Timothy Gaston’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not flagged, uncertain or not yet analysed.

3,162 records match, page 25 of 127.

  1. Written question AQW 46738/22-27

    • Department for Infrastructure

    To ask the Minister for Infrastructure to detail (i) an update on the phased review of taxi legislation, specifically whether the review of Class C taxi licensing for funeral and wedding cars has now concluded; (ii) whether she has received any recommendations arising from the review; and (iii) when any proposed…

    Not flagged

  2. Debate contribution: Legacy Cases: Irish Government

    • Private Members' Business

    The Dublin Government love to talk about truth, accountability and legacy. They even have a case before the European Court of Justice. However, let us have the full truth: the explosives that devastated towns across Northern Ireland did not simply appear; large quantities of commercial explosives that were…

    Not flagged Decided on a second assessment.

  3. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Executive Committee Business

    Thank you, Minister. You mentioned the central index with regard to accessing health records. That is certainly welcome, and it is making progress. However, we have heard at the Committee that, with some of the trusts, the condition that the records are being kept in means that they are being exposed to the elements.…

    Not flagged

  4. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Executive Committee Business

    Will the Minister give way?

    Not analysed

  5. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Executive Committee Business

    You talked about records having to be "borne in mind". What has that got to do with a posthumous date? Victims and survivors should not be discriminated against and not allowed into the scheme because the state, health trusts or religious institutions do not have the necessary records available. I heard that nonsense…

    Not flagged

  6. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Executive Committee Business

    Will the junior Minister give way?

    Not analysed

  7. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Executive Committee Business

    The amendments in this group, particularly those that would amend clause 31, are those on which the Committee spent the most time. The Committee invested significant amounts of time listening to and taking evidence from people who came forward. The whole idea of that was to ensure that the Bill would be the best that…

    Not flagged

  8. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Executive Committee Business

    You talk about lived experience and the standardisation process that we will enter into, yet the legislation contains a posthumous date. That discriminates against people who were admitted to one of those settings but, because of the date, will not qualify. You cannot have it both ways.

    Not flagged

  9. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Executive Committee Business

    Will the Minister give way?

    Not analysed

  10. Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Executive Committee Business

    Like all other members of the Committee who have spoken before me, I want Hansard to record my appreciation and thanks to all the victims and survivors who stepped forward to give evidence to the Committee in the room, at the stakeholder events or through correspondence. The oral testimonies that we heard were…

    Not flagged

  11. Debate contribution: Police Ombudsman: High Court Ruling

    • Matter of the Day

    I welcome yesterday's ruling on the unlawful findings of collusive behaviour against former RUC officers. For years, findings of that nature by the Police Ombudsman have been used to demonise and discredit the good name of a proud force that lost 319 officers to terrorists. Let us be clear: it is a scandal that should…

    Flagged Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism Criteria met: Identity framing, Sectarian or communal antagonism, Dog-whistle messaging, Controversy escalation.

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON