Debate contribution: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast
When is later?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast
Mr Timothy Gaston: Assembly records
All of Mr Timothy Gaston’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not flagged, uncertain or not yet analysed.
3,162 records match, page 21 of 127.
Debate contribution: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast
In the Chamber yesterday, I was ridiculed by the self-righteous MLAs to my left, including the Justice Minister, for daring to highlight issues around immigration and the impact that it has on working-class communities. The word that Sinn Féin Member for North Belfast Carál Ní Chuilín used was "obnoxious". I wonder…
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers Criteria met: Identity framing, Sectarian or communal antagonism, Dog-whistle messaging, Controversy escalation.
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast
Other tabled business: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast
Serious Stabbing in North Belfast
Assessment details for Other tabled business: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast Official Assembly record for Other tabled business: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast
Urgent oral question: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast
Serious Stabbing in North Belfast To ask the Minister of Justice for an update on the serious stabbing incident in the Kinnaird Avenue area of North Belfast and the information currently available regarding the suspect arrested in connection with the attack including his nationality, religion and immigration status.
Assessment details for Urgent oral question: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast Official Assembly record for Urgent oral question: Serious Stabbing in North Belfast
Written question AQW 48306/22-27
To ask the Minister for Infrastructure to detail how many of the 5,300 additional properties now able to connect to the wastewater infrastructure are for applicants made by private contractors.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 48306/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 48306/22-27
Written question AQW 48305/22-27
To ask the Minister for Infrastructure to detail how many of the 5,300 additional properties now able to connect to the wastewater infrastructure are located in North Antrim.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 48305/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 48305/22-27
Written question AQW 48304/22-27
To ask the Minister for Infrastructure to detail how many of the 5,300 additional properties now able to connect to the wastewater infrastructure are for social housing.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 48304/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 48304/22-27
Written question AQW 48303/22-27
To ask the Minister for Infrastructure to detail the local council areas that benefited from the additional 5,300 additional properties now able to connect to the wastewater infrastructure.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 48303/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 48303/22-27
Written question AQW 48302/22-27
To ask the Minister for Communities to detail the number of senior staff currently employed by local councils through an agency, broken down by (i) local council; and (ii) duration in post.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 48302/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 48302/22-27
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
I will get back to the debate and the reasons that I have set out as to why I do not support amendment No 78 in the name of Connie Egan. I care deeply about the Christian heritage of Northern Ireland, so I oppose that amendment and look forward to joining the DUP in the "No" Lobby. Regarding the rest of the amendments…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Maybe "part-time Minister" was not the right phrase; "caretaker Minister" is OK because she wants to turn a blind eye to anything that happens in the PSNI, but that is up to the Minister and her directorate.
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
The part-time Minister in Justice —.
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
— I do not want to be the one to burst her balloon.
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
— Justice Minister has set herself —
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
— if that is the pedestal on which the —
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
— but that is for the fairies. However —
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
I did not know that amendment No 73 would give us the power to influence any other country in the world. The Justice Minister may think that there are those around the world waiting to see what Stormont does —
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
— was in 1977. I am happy to give way to the Justice Minister.
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
I put it back to the Member: what harm is the law doing? You referred to it as a dead law. As I set out, the most recent time when there was an issue —
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
I will move on. Amendment No 73 acknowledges that blasphemy is a common-law offence, rather than one that is codified in any piece of legislation. The last successful prosecution for the offence was back in 1977 and was a private prosecution rather than one brought by the state. The case went the whole way and was…
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice) Criteria met: Identity framing, Cultural grievance politics, Dog-whistle messaging, Controversy escalation.
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
There we go, Mr Deputy Speaker.
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Is that better now?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
I thank the Minister for her intervention. I am not here to lecture anybody. I am here to point out and stand up for the constituency that me to come to the Chamber to speak on their behalf. The Minister's contribution shows that she is more interested in freedom from religion. So I do not agree —
Decided on a second assessment.
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
I am happy to give way.
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
I will focus my brief remarks on the group 3 amendments solely on Ms Egan's amendment No 73, which inserts a new clause to abolish blasphemy. That amendment is the latest attempt to further diminish our Christian country and the conservative DNA that runs through it. The Justice Minister's introductory comments on the…
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice) Criteria met: Identity framing, Cultural grievance politics, Dog-whistle messaging, Controversy escalation.
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage
Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON