Analysis in progress – figures are incomplete

12,788 of 97,616 records that can be analysed have been assessed so far (13.1%); 84,827 are waiting for analysis and 1 failed and will be retried. Totals and rankings will change as the remaining records are processed, so they do not yet represent the full mandate. How much has been processed

Ms Sorcha Eastwood: Assembly records

All of Ms Sorcha Eastwood’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not qualifying, uncertain or not yet analysed.

269 records match, page 4 of 11.

  1. Debate contribution: Job Creation: Ambitious Targets

    • Private Members' Business

    I agree with Jonny. One of the great things that we have done early doors in the Committee — Mr Brett is not here at the moment, but he has been supportive of this — is the fact that we are going to have a joint session with the Education Minister and the Economy Minister. I know that all members were in agreement…

    Awaiting analysis

  2. Debate contribution: Job Creation: Ambitious Targets

    • Private Members' Business

    I thank the Member for giving way. The point that I was simply trying to make was that it is not right that we have educational inequality to the extent that it impinges on life chances and that is what we need to get right. Yes, there is a regional imbalance, but I am sure that the Member will agree that we need to…

    Awaiting analysis

  3. Debate contribution: Job Creation: Ambitious Targets

    • Private Members' Business

    Alliance will support the motion and the amendment. You would be hard-pressed to find anybody who would stand up and say that they do not support more job creation. I echo some of what Sinéad McLaughlin, the Member for Foyle, said about the earlier debate on education and poverty when she was moving her amendment. Do…

    Awaiting analysis

  4. Debate contribution: Further Education Delivery Model: Review

    • Oral Answers to Questions

    I thank the Minister for his response. The substantive point is that the review of the FE delivery model has stopped and started over the years, so what does his Department intend to do to bring it to a conclusion?

    Not analysed

  5. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    • Private Members' Business

    Thank you. I am all for debate, but I will tell you what it is: we are not going to sit here today, after this place has been down for a lock of years, and turn round at the first opportunity, after people have made the best impression about Northern Ireland in the US in trying to get jobs, trying to get trade, trying…

    Awaiting analysis

  6. Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion

    • Private Members' Business

    Apologies, my voice is a little weak today — a bit like the DUP position on dual market access. A few short weeks ago, we welcomed the return of the institutions. The public were maybe not delighted but certainly relieved that we had people in this place making laws that would help to make their life better. However,…

    Awaiting analysis

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON