All of Mr Matthew O'Toole’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not flagged, uncertain or not yet analysed.
3,043 records match, page 111 of 122.
To ask the Minister for Communities whether his Department has taken responsibility for adjusting the Limitation (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 in order to increase the time period for owners of defective properties to pursue civil claims.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 9310/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 9310/22-27
— this is a point of order — that Minister will give clarity on whether they genuinely believe, unlike what is stated in the explanatory memorandum, that this represents a new regulatory border? Thank you.
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Would it be in order — I ask for your advice on this — given that the overwhelming majority of the Assembly voted to maintain our dual market access and benefits for small craft producers, that you write to the UK Minister of the Crown, who is named in the relevant legislation, to ask…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
I appreciate the Member giving way. Speaking of people who voted to impose things, though he calls me, along with other parties, a protocol implementer, I never had the opportunity to vote in total and overall to implement the protocol, which is a good thing in the context of Brexit being a very bad thing. Has he…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
I thank Mr Clarke for that answer. On 3 February, we were nominated as the official Opposition, and I took up the role as leader of the Opposition. Although I am sure that it causes occasional irritation to colleagues, that is a role that I have been charged with doing. As yet, we have not received a penny of the…
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Opposition: Resourcing Entitlements Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Opposition: Resourcing Entitlements
A previous iteration of the protocol, now the Windsor framework, omitted guarantees of origin from the North being sold into the South and more widely onto the electricity market in Europe. Will the Minister explore with his officials getting that added to the protocol so that we can benefit from our access to the…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Renewable Electricity Support Scheme Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Renewable Electricity Support Scheme
That was a bit of a speech. I am happy to give way for Members to make interventions that are specifically about the debate. I do not think that the DUP motion and motivations today are the right ones, but I am here to debate the substance because that is what is in the Order Paper. Those of us who believe in the EU…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
The concerns are very minimal and they are In the interests of having a fulsome debate, I am happy to give way to Ms Eastwood, if she wants to say something.
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
Thank you, Mr Speaker. I was unaware, happily listening to the debate. In answer to Mr Beattie's point, I will scrutinise a little bit of what is in the legislation, though we have had very little time to look at the detail. The detail is not mysterious or unknown to us. I will cover a little bit of the detail. We…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
I thank the Member for giving way. This should not have come at such short notice, but there is a lot of information out there. I know that we were all busy during the St Patrick's Day weekend, but there is a lot of information out there, and this is not a huge deal, one way or the other; it is of medium-positive…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
I appreciate the Member for being open to interventions and giving way. He mentioned Donegal tweed as an example and the UK Government being responsible for taking it off the shelves if it was not compliant. Would not that only be the case if it was non-compliant Donegal tweed? If it was Donegal tweed produced in a…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
I am happy to debate the issue at length today with the Member. Since we are talking about ironies, does he think that it is ironic that the DUP has tabled an applicability motion that it is going to vote against?
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
Will the Member give way?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Regulation (EU) 2023/2411: Applicability Motion
First, I should say that, when I came into the Chamber today, I did not expect to hear Mr Allister talk about the subject of budgie smugglers — — but some pleasant surprises await us in the Assembly. I want to speak about the important matter of my constituents who, around a decade ago, invested in apartments at…
Assessment details for Member's statement: Victoria Square Residential Development Official Assembly record for Member's statement: Victoria Square Residential Development
Limitation (NI) Order 1989 To Ask the Minister of Communities, further to press coverage on the plight of Victoria Square apartment owners, when he will bring forward legislation to amend the Limitation (NI) Order 1989 in order to increase the time period for owners of defective properties to pursue civil claims.
Assessment details for Urgent oral question: Limitation (NI) Order 1989 Official Assembly record for Urgent oral question: Limitation (NI) Order 1989
To ask the First Minister and deputy First Minister how many formal meetings have taken place on a draft Programme for Government since May 2022.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 9203/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 9203/22-27
To ask the Minister of Justice whether her Department is responsible for enacting the legislation outlined in recommendation three of the Operation Kenova Interim Report.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 9202/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 9202/22-27
To ask the Minister of Finance whether he intends to commence the powers to set Corporation Tax funding as provided for in the Corporation Tax (Northern Ireland) Act 2015.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 9201/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 9201/22-27
To ask the Minister of Finance to detail the date on which she was first notified, whether verbally or in writing, of the UK Government decision to remove the ringfence from shared and integrated education Fresh Start funding.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 9200/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 9200/22-27
To ask the Minister of Education to detail the date on which he was first notified, whether verbally or in writing, of the UK Government decision to remove the ringfence from shared and integrated education Fresh Start funding.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 9199/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 9199/22-27
— my party's support for his motion today?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects
— happy to accept —
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects
— and that he is —
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects
I am intrigued. The Member is clearly dying to play politics with the issue rather than get agreement on a motion that we are actually supporting today. It is slightly strange that I am having a debate with someone whose motion and policy intent I support. Will he also confirm that it was clear, unlike statements that…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects
Will the Member give way?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Integrated Education: Fresh Start Funding for Capital Projects
Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON