Analysis in progress: 88,493 of 97,621 records assessed (90.6%). Totals and rankings will change until it finishes. Progress details

90.6%

Mr Mark Durkan: Assembly records

All of Mr Mark Durkan’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not qualifying, uncertain or not yet analysed.

3,279 records match, page 5 of 132.

  1. Written question AQW 53217/22-27

    • Department for Communities

    To ask the Minister for Communities whether his Department will engage with the Department for Work and Pensions to explore arrangements whereby pensioners whose state pension takes them above their Personal Allowance for tax purposes, can have any tax due deducted from their monthly State Pension payments, rather…

    Not qualifying

  2. Written question AQW 52840/22-27

    • Department for Infrastructure

    To ask the Minister for Infrastructure to detail any steps that are being considered to ensure that passengers, aged 16 to 23, continue to have access to affordable public transport, particularly in the event that the current yLink discount is reduced, following Translink’s Equality Impact Assessment and consultation…

    Not qualifying

  3. Debate contribution: Road Safety Strategy

    • Oral Answers to Questions

    The Minister has outlined some welcome measures that are progressing to improve road safety and reduce the risk to road users. Some of those measures have been in the pipeline for a while. I did not hear anything about the road safety concern that I hear most from constituents, and that is around e-scooters and…

    Awaiting analysis

  4. Debate contribution: Support for Veterans and their Families

    • Ministerial Statement

    Thanks to the Minister for the statement. The Minister says that veterans should not be disadvantaged by receiving compensation or recognition payments, and I agree; nobody should be. Will he explain why a worker on low income who receives an overdue backdated pay rise or a recognition payment is not only not…

    Awaiting analysis

  5. Written question AQW 52691/22-27

    • Department of Health

    To ask the Minister of Health whether any consideration has been given to the introduction of Martha’s Rule, to ensure that when patients, families or carers believe someone’s condition is deteriorating and their concerns are not being heard, they have access to a rapid review from an independent clinical team.

    Not qualifying

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON