Analysis in progress: 97,637 of 97,960 records assessed (99.7%). Totals and rankings will change until it finishes. Progress details
All of Mr Gerry Carroll’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not flagged, uncertain or not yet analysed.
3,896 records match, page 21 of 156.
To ask the Minister of Justice to detail the number of children under 16 that have been (i) arrested; (ii) charged; and (iii) prosecuted, in each of the last five years.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 46662/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 46662/22-27
To ask the Minister of Health, pursuant to AQW 44390/22-27, to detail the number of share care arrangements that have been put in place in each of the last five years.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 46665/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 46665/22-27
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs to detail any consideration he has given to including key landscapes and waterways, like the Mournes and Lough Neagh, in protection as essential regional assets.
Assessment details for Written question AQW 46661/22-27 Official Assembly record for Written question AQW 46661/22-27
Yes.
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
I am looking for clarity on amendment No 41 as well. I take the junior Minister's point about wanting to protect people and not hurt or traumatise them unduly. For clarification, will the amendment apply just to institutions and people from institutions who release information or breach an order, or will it apply to…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
Will the junior Minister give way?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
Like other Members, I will not speak for long on this group. I want to reflect some practical concerns about the application form as it is drafted, including concerns raised by my constituent Claire, who has gone through it in some detail. The form requires a power of attorney or a controllership order for anyone who…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
I think that it is amendment Nos 44 to 46.
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. I think that we may have missed a few amendments in that grouping.
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
I appreciate that. I was gracious with my time as well, but I thank the Minister. Will she answer the question? Is it the Executive Office's opinion that it would likely be a small group of women to whom the standardised payment would extend?
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
Will the Minister give way?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
I take the Minister back to amendment No 30. Does she agree with me and other Members that the number of people who are both adoptees and birth mothers is likely to be small? In addition, aside from citing international examples of where that is not in legislation, will she explain why the amendment should not be…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
Will the Minister give way?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
As I said before, I do not sit on the Committee, but, like others, my party took direction from victims and survivors through various meetings and correspondence. I thank them for that, and I acknowledge, as I did earlier, the people in the Public Gallery. I will begin with the words of Lisa, a constituent of mine.…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
I appreciate the Member's giving way. I am not on the Committee, as she knows, but I believe that the Committee received some evidence or correspondence from groups or individuals to say that they prefer the higher figure of £15,000 or £20,000. Twelve thousand pounds is better than £10,000, but we should aim for those…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
I appreciate the Member's giving way. Does she agree that it is less about creating a hierarchy and more about recognising that, if abuse happened on more than one occasion, people should be allowed some form of redress and equality in recognition of that?
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
I appreciate the junior Minister's giving way. I am not sure that that is the case, but, given the fact that the amendment is in line with how the Bill is written, is it not also the case that the legislation itself could very much have unintended consequences?
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
Will the Minister give way?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
We were told by the Bill Office when we were drafting the amendments that we had to use the term "mother", rather than "birth mother", because it was in line with legislation as written already. I just want to provide that clarity to the Minister and the House.
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
Will the Minister give way?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
Thank you, Minister. To paraphrase, you said at the start that the legislation should be victim-focused, and we all agree on that. Do you recognise that the Victims and Survivors Consultation Forum supports the time for a judicial review to be extended to at least 28 days, if not beyond that?
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
Will the Minister give way?
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
I appreciate that, Minister. The unit at St Teresa's only runs to Key Stage 1, and the parents want to extend it until primary 7, as with others. It would be remiss of me not mention the wonderful Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists event that was held in the Chamber earlier with the wonderful May…
Not analysed
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Universities: Speech and Language Therapy Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Universities: Speech and Language Therapy
I appreciate that. Some of it is interpretation, and, if it needs to be strengthened or added to, I am not precious about it. I am precious about organisations that are not coming forward with information being held to account. My interest is in that being done in the best way possible. I am not precious in that…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
In one second, yes. We know that some records are held in the Republic and in religious archives, where religious institutions have shown little appetite for transparency. The inquiry is to do justice to the full truth and cannot be hamstrung at the border. Abuse and the transfer of people did not stop at the border.…
Assessment details for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage Official Assembly record for Debate contribution: Inquiry (Mother and Baby Institutions, Magdalene Laundries and Workhouses) and Redress Scheme Bill: Consideration Stage
Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON