Analysis in progress: 78,256 of 97,621 records assessed (80.2%). Totals and rankings will change until it finishes. Progress details

80.2%

Mr Doug Beattie MC: Assembly records

All of Mr Doug Beattie MC’s imported questions, contributions and motions in this mandate, newest first, including those assessed as not qualifying, uncertain or not yet analysed.

956 records match, page 5 of 39.

  1. Written question AQW 48181/22-27

    • Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs to detail (i) any steps his Department plans to take to address agricultural runoff and wastewater management more effectively; and (ii) whether there are any plans to strengthen enforcement against environmental breaches.

    Not qualifying

  2. Debate contribution: Justice Bill: Consideration Stage

    • Executive Committee Business

    I will make remarks on a number of the amendments in group 3. First, it has been a really good and informative debate. I have picked up quite a bit from it. It has, of course, had passion, and it has, without a doubt, been robust and challenging. However, everything that has been said has been fair and been delivered…

    Awaiting analysis

  3. Motion or amendment: Review of the Police Ombudsman’s Office

    • Motion · Private Members' Motion

    Review of the Police Ombudsman’s Office That this Assembly notes the serious and damaging investigation into the previous Police Ombudsman; acknowledges that this had a detrimental effect on the credibility of the position; accepts the operational and financial independence of the Police Ombudsman’s Office; recognises…

    Not qualifying

  4. Written question AQW 46643/22-27

    • Department of Justice

    To ask the Minister of Justice, regarding the Joint Guidance for Medical Practitioners on Injury on Duty Awards, to detail (i) whether amendments require ministerial approval or agreement from her Department; and (ii) any formal (a) scrutiny; (b) consultation; (c) governance; and (d) Assembly oversight, that applies…

    Not qualifying

  5. Debate contribution: Legacy Cases: Irish Government

    • Private Members' Business

    Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. Legacy is a running sore in Northern Ireland and further afield. I know that all of us in the Chamber will look at legacy through a different prism, and that is fine. The substance of the motion is similar to that of one that I brought to the Chamber in March of last year about the Dublin…

    Awaiting analysis

  6. Motion or amendment: Banning the Use of Aversive Training Tools for Domestic Animals

    • Motion · Private Members' Motion

    Banning the Use of Aversive Training Tools for Domestic Animals That this Assembly recognises the need to promote animal welfare and humane training methods for domestic animals; agrees that aversive training tools including shock collars, prong collars, choke chains and grot collars are a barbaric and cruel way to…

    Not qualifying

  7. Motion or amendment: Banning the Use of Aversive Training Tools for Domestic Animals (Revised Wording)

    • Motion · Private Members' Motion

    Banning the Use of Aversive Training Tools for Domestic Animals (Revised Wording) That this Assembly recognises the importance of promoting animal welfare and humane, reward-based training methods for domestic animals; agrees that aversive training tools, including shock collars, prong collars, choke chains and grot…

    Not qualifying

  8. Motion or amendment: The Irish Government’s Failure to Cooperate on Legacy Cases - Amendment 1

    • Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “The Irish Government’s Failure to Cooperate on Legacy Cases”

    The Irish Government’s Failure to Cooperate on Legacy Cases - Amendment 1 Leave out all after ‘Secretary of State for Northern Ireland’ and insert: ‘continued to advance the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill under direct political pressure from the Irish Government; further believes the UK Government should consider…

    Not qualifying

  9. Other tabled business: Publication of the Sir Frank Atherton report on issues related to the Cervical Screening Programme

    • Matters of the Day

    Publication of the Sir Frank Atherton report on issues related to the Cervical Screening Programme

    Not qualifying

  10. Debate contribution: St Patrick’s Day in Downpatrick

    • Adjournment

    This is outside my patch, so I might do a little bit of promotion for somewhere else. Thank you, Colin, for bringing this forward: your enthusiasm is infectious, and you have a story to tell. St Patrick is an important religious and cultural figure. The St Patrick story travels the centuries in various guises. As a…

    Awaiting analysis

  11. Debate contribution: Police: Injury on Duty Awards

    • Oral Answers to Questions

    I thank the Minister for her comprehensive answer. The 'Joint Guidance for Medical Practitioners on Injury on Duty Awards' was placed on a statutory footing in 2024, which means that it is legally binding. However, the first page states: "Please note however as this document does not have statutory underpinning".…

    Not analysed

  12. Debate contribution: Public Services Reform and Transformation

    • Oral Answers to Questions

    I thank the Minister for her answer. In many ways, she has answered my supplementary question, which was about the specifics and how we measure those outcomes. Minister, given the finite amount of money that is being used for this delivery unit over a five-year period, are there any plans to increase that funding?

    Not analysed

Download all records matching these filters (up to 100,000 rows): CSV · JSON